Please Vote for Your Fave!

In honor of growing my hair out long and not butchering it, since I am my own hairdresser, I decided to have a lil' photo shoot today to update my online avatars. I got these two images I thought were kind of nice - but I'm not sure which one I'll choose. The top two make me look kinda haggard - but I don't think that is a bad thing necessarily. I'm a bit obsessed with being old. I did two different treatments, the second one screams, "I just left a 70's disco party, and yes, that is powder on my nose."

The bottom photo was taken sort of by surprise - yes, I was the one taking them, but I wasn't expecting this one to work. Maybe I'm reading into things, but I feel like there is more of me in that photo. Plus I look about 10 years old, which is kind of nice. As much as I like being old, it's nice to have the option not to look it.









Read More......
StumbleUpon

Welcome to the Toughest Job on Earth Mr. President

I caught a few blips on TV and a few Twitters about the inauguration. So many people were overjoyed, some crying, some cheering, some relieved. Even a skeptic and curmudgeon like me cracked a smile. It was all quite beautiful. Barack and Michelle Obama couldn't have looked better, and the events went off without a hitch. Sorry about Ted Kennedy, but I hear he's okay.

However, the kind of intellectual food I crave was nowhere to be found on Capitol Hill. The ceremonies, perfectly coordinated, were nothing more than the similar kinds of repetitious sound bytes expertly laced together by media experts, psychologists, and speechwriters. Essentially a repeat of the months of campaigning with only one side on display, prettier outfits, and better food. Tony Woodlief sums up the disappointing results (emphasis mine),

It was revealing that one of the speeches most worthy of note, from the incomparable Forest Whitaker, was essentially a selection from William Faulkner's Nobel acceptance speech, an uplifting affirmation of art and truth that is at the same time a denunciation of the worst of post-modernism and relativism. What we have forgotten, as unwittingly attested by the voices at this concert (excepting Mr. Obama, of course, who is a first-rate speaker), is that actors are not, in a classical Aristotelian sense, artists. They are skilled, to be sure, but they are empty vessels, to be fitted to parts as suits the real artists, the writers and photographers, the costumers and make-up specialists. This is not to deny the accidental beauty of Marisa Tomei or Jamie Foxx, or the emotive skill of Denzel Washington. But something is strangely out of whack when speeches are to be delivered at the foot of Lincoln, on ground hallowed by King, and the deliverers we choose are none of them thinkers or writers.

I don't know much about Barack Obama. Oddly, though, he makes me want to know. And perhaps this is his victory - that even those who dislike his policies are insanely curious about him. Obama, well, he seems intelligent, so why all the bad ideas? What is he about? What is he trying to get at? What, if anything, will he accomplish? Is he truly a thinker? Did he even write those books he published? Does he have a coherent system of thought that isn't hidden behind the baffling and meaningless modifier pragmatist? Does Obama have a hobby? Has he ever gotten mad? What kind of music does he like? Is he proud of his Kenyan roots?

I'm fascinated to find out what's going to happen next. Fear, trepidation, and yes, even hope is in my heart. I hope everything turns out well for the President. I really do.





Read More......
StumbleUpon

Hollywood, Stick to Making Movies

I've ignored a truant exclamation or two from overly-enthused Oscar winners, but the latest dramas spilling forth from Hollywood are beyond comprehension.

Che Guevara, the other Son of God
I am baffled by director Steven Soderbergh's glorification of bigot and murderer Che Guervara whom he deifies in Che. Benicio del Toro plays the hero, and says Che was, "Kind of like Jesus, in a way - only Jesus would turn the other cheek. Che wouldn't." Right.

To help del Toro get a grip on reality, there are other notable dissimilarities between Jesus and Che Guevara which are apparent via this link. (I don't re-post the Guevara quotes from Motorcycle Diaries here as they are vile and racist.)

Writer Rodrigo Orihuela offers a bizarre compliment about Che, "He could never be accused of spending a life on an armchair dreaming of how to change the world, as idealists do. He went out to change it, whether or not you agree with what he wanted." Well, he has a point. We could say the same of many other disgusting rogue political activists, terrorists, and dictators throughout history. They don't just sit around and dream of killing people and destroying nations - they actually do it.

I have enjoyed the Soderbergh films I have seen: the Ocean's Eleven series, Traffic, Erin Brockevich, (Syriana was OK) - but I can assure you, I won't be dropping loose change in a theater parking lot on the off chance a single penny I've earned would go to this film.

Soderbergh says, "Che’s dream of a classless society, a society that isn’t built on the profit motive, is still relevant. The arguments still going on are about his methodology." Soderbergh should skip the high school poli-sci class rhetoric and read about Cuba from an actual Cuban.

I believed in Santa Claus at one point as well, so I can understand where Soderbergh is coming from. But, it appears as if he is trying to place himself above profit motive, and is promoting the eradication of classes. I'm assuming he wouldn't speak this way unless he led by example, no? His comments only make sense if he meant we all deserve to become Hollywood moguls regardless of our level of talent or output, thereby rendering his lifestyle, opportunities, and income useless.

It would follow that he's never made a film for money, correct? He would never say something like, "I’d made two films for Universal but they were low-budget, loser films and Casey Silver (Universal bigwig) wanted to find a proper studio project for me." And this entire interview he did with Wired about how to innovate to keep making profits in a world of piracy was probably just a series of misunderstandings about how the movie industry can still earn their fair profit share in a world where consumers are out-smarting anti-piracy protections.

To be perfectly clear, I have nothing against Soderbergh making money. I've liked his films, they entertain me, I happily give his projects my money and hope he lives a long life to make many more. Have at it. But what I don't appreciate is his making millions through a capitalist system then pretending he is somehow above, or independent of it.

Supply and Demand be Damned!
The next feat of mental gymnastics comes when British actress Emma Thompson compares building a tarmac to under-aged sexual slavery. Is this the result of a Stanislavski or Hagen exercise I'm unaware of? I know metaphors are quite useful for acting, but this is too much of a stretch for my untrained mind.

She recently bought land near Heathrow airport to prevent construction of a third runway. She is confident this move will keep Heathrow from increasing the number of flights demanded by consumers by her stunning display of increasing awareness about global warming. I'm fairly certain most people are aware of the situation, and taking away their ability to fly from a desired destination is probably only going to annoy them, not educate them.

She explains, "I thought it was worth making the point for all the people in the country who have been quietly trying to do their little bit to reverse climate change. And then the Government shamelessly turns round and says, we are doing this! And they say they're doing it because there's a demand. There might be a demand for child prostitution, but that doesn't make it moral! The demand for more cars and planes is immoral. I thought we were being treated as though we were stupid."

It must be hard for Ms. Thompson to face the immoral act of demanding airplane flight for the many roles she plays and films in various locations worldwide, and events she must attend for PR purposes. Clearly she does this against her will since the only way one becomes an actress is through coersive force by a third party. Furthermore, since demand of airplane flight is so similar to child prostitution, I can understand her fury and disillusionment. In fact, it probably pained her greatly to be required by force to attend the Golden Globe awards across the world in LA just two days after her revolutionary political intervention.

Of course the fact that Ms. Thompson makes much of her living by polluting a great deal via airplane doesn't mean she is making the wrong move. Again, I don't much care that she bought the land, it's her money, they let her do it, whatever. But she is deluding herself by thinking that her decision going to significantly help mitigate pollution, or that her decision is more meaninful and informed than the tens of thousands of people who actually wanted the additional flights from Heathrow. Furthermore, they will simply seek flights elsewhere. Thankfully Britain is still a free society, and Ms. Thompson's idiotic opinion is not writ into law. I'm guessing another airport is quite pleased with this turn of events and is going to discreetly begin plans for expansion, with their hearty thanks going out to Ms. Thompson for aiding the competitive capitalist process.
Photo by Simon Shek





Read More......
StumbleUpon

Finding Love

Even Bad Advice Is Good For New Insights
My post from last week was the most recent in a line of quasi-love-letters about my marriage. I was surprised and heartened to see numerous comments on Brazen Careerist defending marriage and love, even from those who have their doubts.

But after thinking about it, I realized how awful my advice was for people who are not in great relationships. I'm sure many of you who are single, divorced, or disillusioned by love thought, "Oh shut up! Glad you're happy, now sod off."

I get it. Completely. If I were you I'd tell me to shut up too. I have to remember I hit the relationship jackpot. In fact, Mike and I were talking about all the incredible people we know who are still single and looking for love. I wish we could get them all into one room and say, "Hey, you are all extremely cool, why don't some of you shack up?"

Also, I'm incredibly lucky to have past relationship horrors erased from immediate memory, and to have learned that I don't have to repeat my parent's mistakes which made their marriage difficult and end in divorce. I don't really think about the past and believe my relationship with Mike has healed much of the hurt. But the wounds were fresh, real, and very painful at one point.

Journey Down Misery Lane
Let's skip back four years, before I met Mike. I was miserable. Really miserable. I had a great job, but not one I loved. I lived with my parents and struggled with finding autonomy and a positive self-image. I was dating, if you could call it that. I made mistakes. Huge mistakes. Like the kind of mistakes I won't write about here.

I dated men who would never to commit to me. I did this on purpose. I dated men who may have spent time in prison, or revealed they spoke in tongues, or asked for my hand in marriage two weeks into dating. I accepted an invitation from an ex-boyfriend who'd just ended his engagement to another woman to stay with him in New York, only to be kicked out onto the street, literally, while he decided to have a nervous breakdown.

My love life was hell. After the New York episode my self-worth plummeted. I was convinced I'd spend the rest of my life single and entered a two-year long period of disordered eating and depression. To lift my spirits I turned to music, which is how I met Mike. At the time dating sounded like a miserable affliction no one should ever wish upon themselves, so I wasn't looking at him as a potential partner.

Finding Love. Sort of.
He was kind, sweet, funny, encouraging. We hung out all the time. But I was romantically dead inside and the thought of love didn't register. I only knew I wanted to spend time with him every chance I got, but it's like I couldn't figure out why. And it's not because I loved rehearsing jazz standards every day.

After about a year of working together, he bought a house and I tagged along while he looked for items to fill it with. For all intents and purposes we were dating, but I refused to admit it. So he asked me formally one day, "Hey, would you like to go on a date with me?" I was shocked and replied, "Well, sure, I guess so. When?" He said, "How about right now?"

And so it began. Sort of.

Dontcha Wish Your Girlfriend Was a Freak Like Me
I was closed off, and hell-bent on proving I was unlovable. I fought with him at every turn. I played the role of the suspicious and cynical girlfriend, attempting to defend myself against what I was sure was going to be another failure of a relationship. He didn't play. When I acted out, he didn't respond. He wasn't interested in the typical games. He just enjoyed my company; it was very simple. The fact that he wouldn't engage in the typical relationship shenanigans I used to get embroiled in was proof he was different, special, consistent. The kind of man you marry.

But I still broke up with him on two different occasions. And when I did, I found I was miserable. I also knew he was not the kind of guy who is a pushover and will wait around like a lost puppy for a woman. We still hung out regularly because we had a professional relationship and he still treated with me kindness and respect. Again, it was so unlike the treatment I had gotten from other men. I came to the realization that I was going to ruin the best relationship I'd ever had because I was scared and had lost the ability to trust anyone, most of all myself.

So I took a leap, and after a few months of getting my mental game together, I made a commitment that I was going to do everything within my power to not ruin this relationship and asked if he'd give it another shot. Even if it ended, it wasn't going to be because of my inability to love, trust, and change. And almost miraculously - I did change. I committed. He committed. We grew.

Marriage was the logical culmination of our dating, and the beginning of the most profound relationship I've ever shared with another human being. As a result, I've healed a lot of my past wounds. And that is why I neglected to mention them in my first post, they are distant memories to me, they don't hurt me anymore. But I have to realize not everyone knows what it's like to be able to forget their pain like that. Many people are living those painful moments right now.

I guess the point of writing this is to show I know how you feel. My advice to "just get married" comes from a place of joy, and perhaps, a naive hope that everyone can skip the damage of dating and get to the good part. But I also want to acknowledge my past, and say that the road for me was in no way easy. But it was worth it.






Read More......
StumbleUpon

Illegal Baby Booties For Sale? Someone Alert Congress!!

The video below is heartbreaking for a number of reasons. First, the store owner is unaware of how government regulations affect her business, until the realities of bad legislation actually slap her in the face, finding their way to the products she sells.

She even admits she was wholly in favor of the government-legislated tighter standards for toys, until it started costing her valuable business opportunities. She runs a shop called Eco-Baby which offers a wide variety of organic, recycled, baby clothes and toys. I'm guessing she thought the trickle-down of such regulation would make her store more popular, since she sells the safest toys of all! Of course, she may not have understood that the the Consumer Protection Safety Improvement Act would potentially destroy her business, because it sounds so benign. Who could be against improving consumer safety?

But another reason this is gut-wrenching is that this woman is doing something wonderful, her customers love her products and together they should be allowed to engage in any kind of transaction they choose without the government interfering! I hate that this woman cannot sell her lovely organic booties without the threat of jailing! In fact when I get pregnant I would probably love to look up her store and buy her stuff - and most likely won't be able to. This is the great tragedy of government intervention.

I understand that some people are more comfortable with government regulation of products, and they should never be denied that right. However, the rest of us who are confident in making decisions about toy purchases shouldn't be subject to the same rules.

I think an adequate solution to this problem, instead of making baby-booties illegal, would be to have a sticker saying, "These booties have not been triple-tested meeting the CPSIA-suggested criteria, blah, blah, blah." Or the organic wood blocks from Germany could have a sticker saying, "These blocks meet EU safety standards, but not US, blah, blah, blah." People still have powers of discernment that should allow them to shop at Eco-Baby of their own free will. Seriously.

But it's not all bad news. I for one, am prepared to make a killing on the black market for eco-friendly baby toys.

Read More......
StumbleUpon

Simplify Your Life: Get Married

Photo by greggoconnell

I know this sounds like bad, trite advice. And it is if you think marriage is a sham, blah, blah, blah...this post is not for you. But for those of you in a great relationship, teetering on the edge of committment, just lock it in already. In particular if you are at all interested in simplifying your life, you should get married. I realized today when I read Holly Hoffman's article on the sexual distractions in her life how lucky I was not to have any. Distractions regarding relationships that is. Not no sex.

Anyway, when it comes to my relationship, I'm on terra firma. I mean, Mike and I have our moments where we are ready to shoot gamma-rays out of our eyeballs in rage, but mostly we fight over things like whether or not he should be buying a new guitar pedal, or whether I should make wiping crumbs off the kitchen table a daily goal. (The answer to both those questions being no.)

Getting married has resulted in the most dramatic simplification of life routines I think both Mike and I have ever experienced. It's basic economics really. With the addition of a committed spouse (or whatever other newfangled committed relationship you've got going on) to the household, you can take advantage of division of labor and pooling of resources. So while I've agreed to keep house and make sure our 401Ks are in order, Mike makes a decent living for us and killer fajitas. Our lives run like clockwork for the most part, and that means our free time can be spent without distractions, gazing into each other's eyes, or at the latest episode of Bones.

The marriage/simplification process has been pretty profound now that I think about it. By creative and effective planning, and working on our goals as a unit, I've also been able to quit my job, get rid of my car, and finish grad school without ever leaving the house. I know it sounds a little bit like voluntary imprisonment, but I like it that way. I sometimes feel like a monk, singularly focused, and able to concentrate on whatever discipline I choose, only a lot less holy.





Read More......
StumbleUpon

The Free Market Did Not Fail - Our Regulators Did

I'm guessing this is old news to most people, but today I stumbled upon the documents in the Madoff case citing extensive, substantiated warnings by Harry Markopolos in the Wall Street Journal, "Documents Harry Markopolos submitted to the SEC in fall 2005, making a case that Bernard Madoff's business was a Ponzi scheme."

Here we had an independent securities analyst and derivatives expert, offering his in-depth analysis using widely-accepted options pricing models and claiming in 2005 that the Madoff investment strategy was a Ponzi Scheme. Subsequent dialogue and review by the SEC completely failed to recognize the fraud. Mr. Markopolos persisted in trying to uncover the issue, citing that the SEC investigators did not have his expertise and weren't aware of the true story. His warnings, while cursorily reviewed, now show that the SEC did not have the resources, nor apparently, the desire to delve deep enough into a scandal that has now ruined many lives and charities.

When looked at under the light of free market economics, I couldn't hope for a more clear example of how independent, private review was able to catch a thief, and government regulation did more to protect him. We must call for more private review of business. I have a feeling this type of independent investigation is going to become far more valuable going forward. When we cannot trust our government to protect us, we will seek alternative sources.




Read More......
StumbleUpon

Government Spending Will Not Save The Economy

New Year. New Administration. New Stimulus Packages.

I've taken a few weeks off constant news consumption, but today it hit me: more stimulus is coming. Well, continuing. The stimulus efforts of our government have been carrying on at a steady pace with no signs of slowing; and we all seem to be getting used to it. We are growing more comfortable with the growth of government control and diminishing economic results.

Bickering in Washington between Republicans and Democrats is going something like this:

Democrats: We need a $775 billion package.

Republicans: That's too much.

Democrats: Okay, how about $600?

Republicans: That sounds better, as long as you throw in a little extra for Wall Street.

Democrats: I think we can handle that, as long as you give us automotive, green energy, and infrastructure initiative spending concessions.

Republicans: Agreed!

And everyone walks away happy?

That fictious vignette is meant to make everyone laugh at a little at the tragedy of misconceptions floating around Congress about what will help the economy, but in reality, according to the Wall Street Journal, Democrats are pushing for "...spending as much as $850 billion over two years...'The weak economy demands quick action, and that is our intention,' House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D., Md.) said in an interview Tuesday. 'But significant work remains to be done. We need to do this right and make wise investments...' "

Republicans are faring marginally better, hoping to merely tame the stimulus package plans. They should squash them in my opinion. The Wall Street Journal shows the GOPs bi-partisan solutions are simply PR repair tactics, "Top Republican lawmakers are positioning themselves for battle over President-elect Barack Obama's economic recovery plan, signaling Monday that they will cast themselves as guardians against excessive spending rather than outright opponents of the Democrats' stimulus package."

I don't know. I don't understand it. Money doesn't materialize from nowhere. If the government wants to stimulate the economy by putting more money into the hands of consumers and businesses, doesn't anyone realize that money is coming from somewhere else in the first place? The government has to either tax or borrow more - and neither activity creates wealth or economic growth, it simply shuffles the funds around so that any economic gain in one area will be offset by economic loss elsewhere.

So while there may indeed be isolated areas of the economy that are positively affected in the short term by such stimulus plans, it's a mere magic trick, because another area is suffering, but perhaps it's an area that is less politically important, and deemed worthy of sacrifice based on legislative manipulation. In other words, the government gets to pick the winners and losers. I'm not comfortable with that, and you should not be either.

The following video commentary by Dan Mitchell of the CATO Institute reveals the myths and realities of government stimulus programs. They fail theoretically and in reality.



After watching this video, reading articles about the stimulus package proposals make me cringe, because it is obvious the programs will not lead to the intended promises of true economic growth, despite whatever benefits may be won by politically powerful groups for their causes. But the great thing is, now you can cringe and know better too!

Be sure to pass this video on to anyone you know interested to know how proposed government policies are likely to turn out.




Read More......
StumbleUpon